Another permutation of medical tourism

In Retiring Abroad May Not Be Paradise the Wall Street Journal explains that moving permanently from the US is not as easy or as inexpensive as it seems. The reasons include difficulties with banking, real estate ownership, and being charged higher prices than locals. Health care is another concern: while Americans abroad are eligible for Social Security benefits, Medicare won’t pay for services outside the US. As a result, retirees often hop on a plane to return to the US for medical care or receive care under a local system.

US insurers are beginning to catch on. Cigna has a plan that allows US companies to offer insurance to retirees who move abroad. Just 200 people are enrolled up but Cigna expects significant growth.

I expect we’ll see more seniors leave the US for retirement in lower cost countries with inexpensive labor. If the US continues to toughen restrictions on immigrants it won’t be long before shortages of home care workers and nurses begin to bite. If we won’t let caregivers come to the US, Americans will need to go where the caregivers are. Some Americans will leave the US once they begin to require nursing care or assisted living services. Other retirees living abroad will age into such situations.

Perhaps the trend toward retirement abroad can be used to shore up Medicare’s finances. One solution would be to let Medicare pay for care outside the US. That way Americans wouldn’t return home for expensive treatments but could stay in-country instead, saving Medicare money. If such a policy also encouraged more people to retire abroad that would be ok with me. A less radical step that would be simpler to administer and could achieve the same effect would be to maintain the prohibition on overseas Medicare coverage but give retirees a stepped up Social Security payment if they forego Medicare.

0 thoughts on “Another permutation of medical tourism

  1. Christina deMoraes, MedNetBrazil.com

    Hello David,

    I agree 100% with your post. Care and medical coverage is essential for retirees and should be extended to wherever they are or decide to live. Especially now with Medical Tourism growing and the globalization and standardization of healthcare… why not? Are you listening Presidential Candidates??

    Blessings,
    Christina deMoraes

    Reply
  2. Jonathan Pletzke

    The downside to this, however, is that U.S. dollars – both from Medicare and the retirees themselves, go towards a non-U.S. economy, reducing the *massive* positive impact that retirees have on the U.S. economy.

    Reply
  3. Dave Starr

    Ah yes, Mr. Pletzke, I should be doing my duty and staying in the the US in order to be milked like a cash cow by a medical system which is number one in ine respect only … highest cost per recipient in the world.

    Thanks, but no thanks. I already moved to the Philippines, where I can hire round-the-clock nurses for less than the outrageous ‘bet on the come’ TC insurance, where a visit to a board certified specialist is $6 or $9 and where Medicare could save a fortune if they would fund care instead of requiring US citizens to return to the US. Now that i worked and was taxed 9and shot at) all that time, I am supposed to stay in the US and prop up the economy? I was born at night but it wasn’t last night.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s